|
|
Post by 19101989 on Feb 4, 2010 6:23:27 GMT -5
@doubar : Aye that's what i meant !  and the way i studied it doesn't show it to be so much good  . but as you said there are different debates about it  |
|
|
|
Post by Doubar on Feb 4, 2010 10:32:53 GMT -5
alex: Yeah definitely. And it's no surprise that most poeple understand the idea of eugenics to be a bad and dangerous one. And in deed it is dangerous in a way. I mean, like I said: Hitler had not been the first one to interpret it this radical, but he for sure was the one who exceeded it and covered this term with cruelty and inhumanity. 
|
|
|
|
Post by 19101989 on Feb 5, 2010 5:04:05 GMT -5
@doubar: and unfortunately, it doesn't end with the end of Hitler or the end of the WWII, people began to take it the way the former Nazi leader has developed !they -or most of them- don't look at it any more at the way it should be when it has been invited in the first place |
|
|
|
Post by Doubar on Feb 5, 2010 6:09:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Feb 5, 2010 10:51:58 GMT -5
Just like the swastika en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika . On the Japanese New Year's lantern, you see that symbol, which prays "for a good and prosperous year" or something. The swastika is also on the statue of Jesus Christ. |
|
|
|
Post by Sinbad on Feb 5, 2010 10:59:24 GMT -5
However, there is a clear distinction. Usually swastika´s are upright, like a cross with hooks or the hooks are bent to the left. The national socialist swastika is tilted to the right with it´s hooks to the right as well, so it should not be mistaken for a cult symbol. Best of course is those wannabe neonazis who spray left hooked swastikas on walls.  |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Feb 5, 2010 11:29:55 GMT -5
Sorry, but it is no cult symbol.  |
|
. but as you said there are different debates about it 
